论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨溶栓治疗脑梗塞的临床效果。方法选取我院在2007～2010年间收治的71例脑梗塞患者,随机分为两组,观察组37例,对照组患者34例,首先对两组患者进行常规的基础治疗,在此基础上,观察组患者采用溶栓治疗,对照组患者采用常规的西医进行对症治疗。对比两组患者的治疗效果。结果经过治疗,患者的病情均有不同程度的改善,71例患者中,观察组37例患者,基本治愈17例,显效9例,有效7例,无效5例,有效率为86.5%,对照组34例患者,基本治愈14例,显效7例,有效5例,无效8例,有效率为76.5%,观察组的治疗效果显著优于对照组的治疗效果。结论采用溶栓治疗脑梗塞的效果较好,对于患者病情的康复有较大的帮助,因此,采用溶栓治疗脑梗塞的方法值得在临床推广应用。
Objective To investigate the clinical effect of thrombolytic therapy on cerebral infarction. Methods Seventy-one patients with cerebral infarction admitted to our hospital from 2007 to 2010 were randomly divided into two groups: observation group (37 cases) and control group (34 cases). First, the two groups of patients were treated with conventional basic therapy. On this basis, Patients in the observation group were treated with thrombolytic therapy while those in the control group were treated symptomatically with conventional Western medicine. Compare the treatment effect of two groups of patients. Results After treatment, the patient’s condition improved to some extent. Among 71 patients, 37 patients in the observation group were basically cured in 17 cases, 9 were markedly effective, 7 were effective, 5 were ineffective and the effective rate was 86.5%. In the control group Of the 34 patients, 14 cases were basically cured, 7 cases were markedly effective, 5 cases were effective, 8 cases were ineffective and the effective rate was 76.5%. The therapeutic effect of the observation group was significantly better than that of the control group. Conclusion Thrombolytic therapy of cerebral infarction is better, which is helpful to the recovery of patients’ condition. Therefore, the thrombolytic therapy of cerebral infarction is worthy of clinical application.