论文部分内容阅读
任务分离的实验范式以功能分离和随机独立性等证据说明不同记忆任务的底层系统或加工机制。近期研究发现,两种记忆测量重测信度、复本信度和分半信度差异显著,内隐测验的信度更低一些,因而对变量效果缺乏足够的敏感性。两种测验信度差异对任务分离提出了区别于系统说或加工观点的另外解释。以后在研究外显和内隐记忆分离的时候应该慎重考虑测验信度的检验问题,还应通过各种方法来提高内隐记忆测验的信度,使两种记忆测验的信度具有可比性。
The experimental paradigm of task separation illustrates underlying systems or processing mechanisms for different memory tasks with evidence of functional separation and random independence. Recent studies have found that there is significant difference between the reliability of retesting of two measures of memory, the reliability of coping and the accuracy of sub-half-confidence, and the reliability of implicit tests is lower, so they are not sensitive enough to the effect of variables. The difference between the two test reliability differences in task separation made from the system or processing point of view to explain the other. Later in the study of explicit and implicit memory separation should carefully consider the test reliability test, but also through various methods to improve the reliability of implicit memory test, so that the reliability of the two memory tests are comparable.