《集邮博览》2004年第10期刊登的《“不务正业”的自动化邮票》一文(以下简称“戴文”),将签条和邮票混为一谈,把自动化邮政签条当成了自动化邮票,犯了常识性错误。 “戴文”新列的4种所谓被挪作它用的自动化邮票,其前3种根本不是自动化邮票,而是自动打印的挂号签条、挂号邮资签条,作者却肯定它们是自动化邮票,又说它们“被挪作了挂号签条”, “是挂号签条和自动化邮票的复合”,这种说法是不正确的。说明作者对什么是自动化邮票,什么是自动化签条,概 Stamps on Auto Stamps published in the 10th issue of the “Philatelic Expo” in 2004 (hereinafter referred to as “Dai Wen”) confused the signatures and stamps and used automated postal signatures as an automated stamp, committing common sense error. The first four columns of “Devon” new columns of automated stamps that were used for other purposes were not automated stamps. Instead, they were automatically registered registered signposts and registered postage signposts. The authors, however, affirmed that they are automated stamps, It is incorrect to say that they were “misappropriated as registered signatures” and “a compound of registered signatures and automated stamps.” Explain what the author is about automated stamps, what is automated signatures, and more