目的比较不同强度耐力跑对大学生焦虑症干预效果,为丰富运动抗焦虑的理论体系提供实证依据。方法分别采用较大、中、小3种强度耐力跑,对从潍坊医学院2013级大一学生中筛查出的焦虑倾向大学生进行干预,计算运动前后显性焦虑量表(MAS)、症状自评量表-90的焦虑因子(F5)、焦虑自评量表(SAS)得分。结果干预前,较大强度组、中强度组、小强度组MAS得分分别为(32.65±3.59)(32.89±3.63)(32.69±3.49)分;焦虑因子得分分别为(3.02±0.67)(3.07±0.59)(3.05±0.72)分,焦虑自评量表得分分别为(58.97±4.78)(58.84±4.69)(58.72±4.59)分。干预后,较大强度组、中强度组、小强度组MAS得分分别为(21.38±2.63)(26.19±3.15)(26.98±3.52)分;F5得分分别为(2.29±0.46)(2.57±0.53)(2.69±0.53)分;SAS得分分别为(51.43±3.28)(54.48±2.97)(56.34±3.23)分。较大强度组干预前MAS,F5,SAS得分与干预后相应指标得分差异均有统计学意义(t值分别为3.786,3.264,2.589,P值均<0.05),中强度组干预前MAS,F5,SAS得分与干预后相应指标得分差异均有统计学意义(t值分别为2.987,2.779,2.358,P值均<0.05),小强度组干预前MAS,F5得分与干预后得分差异均有统计学意义(t值分别为2.935,2.658,P值均<0.05)。干预后,各组间MAS,F5,SAS得分的多重比较发现,较大强度组各项得分均小于中强度组及小强度组的相应指标得分,差异均有统计学意义(P值均<0.05)。结论较大、中、小强度耐力跑均可有效改善大学生焦虑水平,3种运动强度中较大强度效果最佳。 Objective To compare the effects of endurance training with different intensity on anxiety disorder among college students and provide empirical evidence for enriching the theoretical system of anti-anxiety exercise. Methods Three kinds of intensity endurance running were used to intervene the anxiety-prone students screened from 2013 freshmen in Weifang Medical College. The scores of dominant anxiety (MAS), symptom self Anxiety factor (F5) of the scale -90, anxiety self-rating scale (SAS) score. Results Before intervention, the scores of MAS in the high-intensity group, middle-intensity group and low-intensity group were (32.65 ± 3.59) (32.89 ± 3.63) (32.69 ± 3.49), and the anxiety factor scores were (3.02 ± 0.67) 0.59) (3.05 ± 0.72), respectively. The score of anxiety self-rating scale was (58.97 ± 4.78) (58.84 ± 4.69) (58.72 ± 4.59) points respectively. After intervention, the scores of MAS in the high-intensity group, middle-intensity group and low-intensity group were (21.38 ± 2.63) (26.19 ± 3.15) and (26.98 ± 3.52) respectively; the F5 scores were (2.29 ± 0.46) and (2.69 ± 0.53) and SAS scores were (51.43 ± 3.28) (54.48 ± 2.97) (56.34 ± 3.23) points respectively. The scores of MAS, F5 and SAS before intervention in the higher intensity group were significantly different from those of the corresponding index after intervention (t = 3.786, 3.324, 2.589, respectively, P <0.05) (T = 2.987,2.779,2.358, P <0.05 respectively). There was statistical difference between the scores of MAS and F5 before intervention and after intervention in the low-intensity group Significance of learning (t values ​​were 2.935,2.658, P <0.05). After intervention, multiple comparisons of MAS, F5 and SAS scores between groups showed that the score of each item in the higher intensity group was lower than that in the middle intensity group and the lower intensity group, and the differences were statistically significant (P <0.05) ). Conclusion The large, medium and small-intensity endurance running can effectively improve the anxiety level of college students, and the stronger of the three kinds of exercise intensity is the best.