论文部分内容阅读
对检察机关在提起民事诉讼中的地位和范围问题,直接涉及法律监督职能的实施,有必要展开讨论。一、地位问题资本主义国家对于检察饥关提起刑事、民事诉讼,其地位都是诉讼当事人(即原告人)。社会主义国家有过三种不同的提法:诉讼当事人;法律监督机关的代表;程序意义上的原告,兼有法律监督的职能。目前,我国对检察机关提起民事诉讼的地位问题,颇多争论,如:民事公诉人、民事起诉人(即程序意义上的原告兼有法律监督职能)、公益代表人、国家代表人、公告人、非权利主体当事人、国家监诉人,等等。公益代表人、国家代表人或公告人的提法,其实质都是基于社会主义公有制,并由此显示国家、集体和个人三者利益密不可分的特
It is necessary to hold discussions on the issue of procuratorial organs’ status and scope in bringing civil proceedings and the direct implementation of legal supervision functions. First, the status issue Capitalist countries for criminal prosecution, civil litigation, its status is litigant (plaintiff). There are three different kinds of formulation in socialist countries: litigants, representatives of legal supervisory organs, plaintiffs in the procedural sense and functions of legal supervision. At present, there are quite a lot of debates over the status of procuratorial organs in bringing civil proceedings in our country, such as civil prosecutors, civil prosecutors (that is, plaintiffs in the procedural sense and legal supervision functions), public service representatives, state representatives, announcers, Non-rights subjects parties, national complainant, and so on. The essence of the formulation of public interest representatives, national representatives or proclamations is based on socialist public ownership and thus shows that the interests of the state, the collective and the individual are inseparable.