论文部分内容阅读
反行政垄断司法救济的途径主要是通过行政诉讼来实现。我国《反垄断法》中涉及的行政诉讼有两类。一类是因行政垄断而提起的行政诉讼,即第32条至第37条。另一类是因执法机构而提起的行政诉讼。即第53条。由于但凡有行政执法,就有可能有当事人对行政执法决定不服,当事人就被赋予了提起行政诉讼权,这不仅在反垄断法里是如此,在其他法律中也是如此。因此,笔者认为此类行政诉讼并非反垄断法所独有,更非反行政垄断所独有。
Anti-administrative monopoly judicial remedy is mainly through administrative litigation to achieve. There are two types of administrative litigation involved in China’s Antimonopoly Law. One is administrative litigation filed for administrative monopoly, namely articles 32 to 37. The other is administrative lawsuits filed by law enforcement agencies. Article 53 Wherever there is law enforcement, there may be parties refusing to accept the decision on administrative law enforcement, and the parties are given the right to institute administrative proceedings, not only in the antitrust laws, but also in other laws. Therefore, I believe that such an administrative lawsuit is not unique to antitrust law, but not exclusive to anti-administrative monopoly.