论文部分内容阅读
崇尚自由是陶渊明和苏轼的共同特点之一,从文学方面来说,陶诗和苏词颇有相似之处。然而,苏轼的绘画思想中表达出的对自由的理解和追求方式,与陶渊明有着明显的不同。词发展到宋朝成为一种可以抒发豪情壮志的文体,绘画则是文人心理情绪的浮现,更能体现出作者最真实的心理感受。苏轼绘画思想中的自由倾向更接近他的真实想法,本文从苏轼的绘画思想入手,从四个方面讨论苏轼与陶渊明对自由的不同诠释和追求,进而在对比中分析陶渊明和苏轼对自由不同的追求方式,发掘中国传统文化中自由思想的蕴含。
Advocating freedom is one of the common features of Tao Yuanming and Su Shi. From a literary perspective, Tao Shi and Su Ci are quite similar. However, the way of understanding and pursuing freedom expressed in Su Shi’s painting thought is obviously different from that of Tao Yuanming. The development of the Ci into the Song dynasty became a kind of style that can express the pride and ambition. Painting is the manifestation of the mentality of the literati, which can better reflect the author’s most true psychological feelings. The freedom tendency in Su Shi’s painting thought is closer to his true idea. This article starts from Su Shi’s painting thought, discusses Su Shi and Tao Yuanming’s different interpretations and pursuits of freedom from four respects, then analyzes the differences of freedom between Tao Yuanming and Su Shi The pursuit of ways to explore the implications of free thinking in Chinese traditional culture.