论文部分内容阅读
现行《物权法(草案)》内容缺乏创新,在体系上表面严谨实质松散,无法面对财产的无体性引起的债权物权化等趋势。因此依照全面比较的研究方法,英美“财产法”应成为我们的借鉴之一。因为物权法制定的根本目的就在于保护社会中的财产权利,而法律移植的应当是精神而不是形式,何况德国物权法的创立有其自身的特定历史环境,在我国实际也没有深入人心。建立我们自己的物权法应当以《民法通则》作为理论和传统依据,从保护使用价值走向鼓励实现交换价值。
The current “Property Law (Draft)” lack of innovation in the content, the system on the surface of rigorous substance loose, unable to face the indefiniteness of property caused by debt and other trends. Therefore, in accordance with the comprehensive comparative research method, Anglo-American “Property Law” should be one of our references. Because the fundamental purpose of the property law is to protect the property rights in society, and the law should be transplanted to the spirit rather than the form, not to mention the creation of the German Property Law has its own specific historical environment, in our country actually did not gain popular support. The establishment of our own property law should be based on the “General Principles of Civil Law” as the theoretical and traditional basis, from the protection of the use value to encourage the exchange value.