如果把比较哲学方法理解为广义的格义研究,则格义是中国哲学史建立的必要步骤,它为建立一门沟通中西精神文化的学科起不可或缺的作用。然而,哲学史的建立不仅基于比较文化的目的,同时也有推动哲学发展的需要。就此而言,格义有自己的局限。我们必须在格义之外,寻求中国哲学论证的新途径。本文以对《庄子》、《孟子》中若干经典片断的分析为例,展示作者诠释学与哲学分析相结合的方法论主张。 If the comparative philosophy is understood as a generalized study of the genres, Geyi is a necessary step in the establishment of the history of Chinese philosophy. It plays an integral role in establishing a discipline that communicates the spiritual culture of China and the West. However, the establishment of the history of philosophy not only based on the purpose of comparative culture, but also to promote the development of philosophy. In this regard, Geyi has its own limitations. We must seek new ways of argumentation of Chinese philosophy beyond the meaning of gens. Taking the analysis of several classic fragments in Zhuangzi and Mencius as an example, this article shows the methodology proposition of the combination of hermeneutics and philosophical analysis.