AIM:To conduct a meta-analysis to compare Rouxen-Y(R-Y) gastrojejunostomy with gastroduodenal Billroth Ⅰ(B-Ⅰ) anastomosis after distal gastrectomy(DG) for gastric cancer.METHODS:A literature search was performed to identify studies comparing R-Y with B-Ⅰ after DG for gastric cancer from January 1990 to November 2012 in Medline,Embase,Science Citation Index Expanded and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials in The Cochrane Library.Pooled odds ratios(OR) or weighted mean differences(WMD) with 95%CI were calculated using either fixed or random effects model.Operative outcomes such as operation time,intraoperative blood loss and postoperative outcomes such as anastomotic leakage and stricture,bile reflux,remnant gastritis,reflux esophagitis,dumping symptoms,delayed gastric emptying and hospital stay were the main outcomes assessed.Meta-analyses were performed using RevMan 5.0 software(Cochrane library).RESULTS:Four randomized controlled trials(RCTs) and 9 non-randomized observational clinical studies(OCS) involving 478 and 1402 patients respectively were included.Meta-analysis of RCTs revealed that R-Y reconstruction was associated with a reduced bile reflux(OR 0.04,95%CI:0.01,0.14;P < 0.00 001) and remnant gastritis(OR 0.43,95%CI:0.28,0.66;P = 0.0001),however needing a longer operation time(WMD 40.02,95%CI:13.93,66.11;P = 0.003).Metaanalysis of OCS also revealed R-Y reconstruction had a lower incidence of bile reflux(OR 0.21,95%CI:0.08,0.54;P = 0.001),remnant gastritis(OR 0.18,95%CI:0.11,0.29;P < 0.00 001) and reflux esophagitis(OR 0.48,95%CI:0.26,0.89;P = 0.02).However,this reconstruction method was found to be associated with a longer operation time(WMD 31.30,95%CI:12.99,49.60;P = 0.0008).CONCLUSION:This systematic review point towards some clinical advantages that are rendered by R-Y compared to B-Ⅰ reconstruction post DG.However there is a need for further adequately powered,welldesigned RCTs comparing the same. AIM: To conduct a meta-analysis to compare Rouxen-Y (RY) gastrojejunostomy with gastroduodenal Billroth I (B-I) anastomosis after distal gastrectomy (DG) for gastric cancer. METHODS: A literature search was done to identify studies comparing RY with B-I after DG for gastric cancer from January 1990 to November 2012 in Medline, Embase, Science Citation Index Expanded and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials in The Cochrane Library. Pooled odds ratios (OR) or weighted mean differences (WMD) with 95% CI were calculated either either fixed or random effects model. Optirative outcomes such as operation time, intraoperative blood loss and postoperative outcomes such an anastomotic leakage and stricture, bile reflux, remnant gastritis, reflux esophagitis, dumping symptoms, delayed gastric emptying and hospital stay were the main outcomes evaluated. Metabs were performed using RevMan 5.0 software (Cochrane library) .RESULTS: Four randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 9 non-randomized Observational clinical studies (OCS) involving 478 and 1402 patients respectively were included. Meta-analysis of RCTs revealed that RY reconstruction was associated with a reduced bile reflux (OR 0.04,95% CI: 0.01,0.14; P <0.00001) and remnant gastritis (OR 0.43, 95% CI: 0.28, 0.66; P = 0.0001), however, there was a need for a longer operation time (WMD 40.02, 95% CI: 13.93, 66.11; P = 0.003). Metaanalysis of OCS also revealed RY reconstruction had a lower incidence of bile reflux (OR 0.21, 95% CI: 0.08, 0.54; P = 0.001), remnant gastritis (OR 0.18, 95% CI: 0.11, This reconstruction method was found to be associated with a longer operation time (WMD 31.30, 95% CI: 12.99, 49.60; P = 0.0008) .CONCLUSION: This systematic review point towards some clinical advantages that are rendered by RY compared to B-Ⅰ reconstruction post DG.However there is a need for further advanced powered, welldesigned RCTs comparing the same.