准确性与可比性相结合。所谓准确性,一是事实存在,二是判断准确。于自我批评者而言,既要把问题与差距实实在在地摆出来,又要挖挖思想根源,切忌“大帽子底下开小差”。于批评者而言,要做到“五不”:不凭道听途说,不搞假设推断,不夸大其辞,不含糊其辞,不上纲上线。所谓可比性,是指批评与自我批评的事实有参照系可比较。就当事人来说,在现在与过去的对比中,有落后的明显性;就周围同志而言,当事人有明显不如他人之处。这样的批评与自我批评对自己 Accuracy and comparability combined. The so-called accuracy, first, the fact exists, and second, to judge accurately. In the case of self-critics, it is necessary to put the problems and gaps in a tangible way and excavate the root causes of the ideals. For critics, it is necessary to achieve “Five No ”: not by hearsay, do not engage in hypothetical inference, do not exaggerate their rhetoric, not ambiguous, not on-line. The so-called comparability refers to the fact that criticism and self-criticism can be compared with the reference frame. As far as the parties concerned are concerned, the contrast between the present and the past lags behind; in the case of the surrounding comrades, the parties are obviously inferior to others. Such criticism and self-criticism of themselves