论文部分内容阅读
政治制度背后是一些基本理念和由理念构筑的逻辑,运行良好的文本制度必须是与这些理念逻辑相适应的。我们可以学习西方司法制度的权力体系、组织建设,却难以建立起与之相配的司法理念,两者的不一致在一定程度上造成了司法中的种种尴尬局面。本文试图通过对比辛普森和赵作海这两个案例,引入统计学中Ⅰ类错误和Ⅱ类错误的概念,从中观察中美司法理念和逻辑的差异。
Behind the political system are some basic concepts and the logic built up by ideas. A well-functioning text system must be compatible with these conceptual logics. We can learn from the power system and organization construction of the Western judicial system, but it is hard to establish the judicial concept that matches with it. The inconsistency between the two has caused the embarrassing situation in the judiciary to a certain extent. This article tries to compare the two cases of Simpson and Zhao Zuohai, introduce the concept of class I error and class II error in statistics, and observe the difference between Chinese and American judicial concepts and logic.