论文部分内容阅读
九、传奇夫人的胜利上面所说的模式,是档案和档案工作在观念形态上的缩影。假如这个立论成立,那么首先碰到的问题是在现代社会里“文书”是什么?现在,“文书”这个概念似乎已成为历史概念。所以,在概念上要弄清楚文书的规定性。按照传统的说法,文书是文件、公文的统称;假使现代文件=信息实体,那么文书也就成为信息实体了。在现代信息社会办公自动化和信息自动化网络等科学技术发展的条件下,文件的形成和作为信息实体的文件,既然仍称之为“文件”,那么是否可以仍沿用“文书”这个概念,作为多样化信息实体的统称?这是现代文书学、秘书学当然也是档案学要研究的。我们现在暂且还是从传统的
Nine, the success of the legendary lady The above-mentioned model is the microcosm of the concept of archives and archives work. If this argument is true, then the first question we have encountered is what is an “instrument” in modern society? The concept of “instrument” now appears to have become a historical conception. Therefore, the concept must be clear about the prescriptive nature of the instrument. According to the traditional theory, an instrument is a collective name of a document or a document. Even if a modern document is an entity of information, the document becomes an entity of information. Under the conditions of the development of science and technology such as office automation and information automation network in the modern information society, the formation of documents and the documents that serve as information entities are still referred to as “documents”, so can the concept of “instruments” still be used as diverse The general term for informational entities? This is modern paperwork, and of course secretarial science is also archival. We are still from the traditional