论文部分内容阅读
通过对不同国家法律的比较研究,既可加深对外国法律的认识,亦有助于对本国法律的进一步了解和改进。但是在比较的时候,必须选择好方法,首先,要注意比较的维度,必须安排好时间和空间的问题。前者便于读者理解作者的思想,后者在于我们更好地把握所比较事物的来龙去脉。其次,要注意掌握比较的理论针对性,即通过比较增强自识与反思的勇气。相互理解只有经过互相诠释来进行,而相互发明则是在渐进与深化的知己知彼中攻错与学习,达到超融与创新。最后,比较不能光停留在表面,要在表象之下,揭示最一般的原理与意义,或许这些原理与意义不会马上转化为治国之道,但必须从中能让我们体会到比较者的“学术天下之公器”的抱负与理想。一个好的法律比较者,就应该按照这样三个方面去进行比较,这样的比较作品才能有意义,也才能最终转化成一国法律改进和发展的动力。
A comparative study of laws of different countries can not only deepen our understanding of foreign laws but also help us to further understand and improve our laws. However, in comparison, we must choose a good method. First of all, we must pay attention to the comparative dimension and must arrange the time and space issues. The former facilitates the reader to understand the author’s thinking, the latter lies in our grasp of the ins and outs of the comparison. Second, we must pay attention to grasp the more theoretical relevance, that is, by comparing the courage to enhance self-awareness and reflection. Mutual understanding only through mutual interpretation, and mutual invention is in progressively and deepening confidante in learning and making mistakes, to achieve financial innovation and innovation. In the end, we can not compare ourselves with the light and reveal the most general principles and meanings. Perhaps these principles and meanings do not immediately translate into governing the country, but we must understand from them how we compare them. Academic world of public equipment "aspirations and ideals. A good comparision of law should be compared according to these three aspects so that the comparative work can make sense and ultimately can be transformed into the driving force of legal improvement and development in a country.