出版社的两难境地解放后,我国的稿酬制度虽然几经变化,但基本上都没有脱离按字数计算基本稿酬这个模式,变来变去,无非是基本稿酬与印数稿酬的有无和高低而已。这个办法的缺点除了计算的繁琐之外,最主要的是作者的报酬与作品所创造的价值脱节,严重的甚至达到相背离的程度。也就是说,作品为出版社赚了钱的,作者不一定多得。而作品使出版社亏本的,作者往往收获颇丰。在计划经济下,出版社受到各种约束,不管愿意不愿意,只能如此或必须如此。并且用“以丰补歉”的理论来宽慰自己。但是,在市场经济的冲击下,出版社在稿酬问题上已经陷入了严重的两 After the dilemma of the publishing house was liberated, although the system of remuneration in China changed several times, it basically did not deviate from the mode of calculating the basic remuneration according to the number of words. It became nothing more than the basic remuneration and the imposition of remuneration. In addition to the cumbersome calculation of the method, the most important thing is that the remuneration of the author is out of step with the value created by the work, even seriously to the extent of deviation. In other words, the work for the press made money, the author may not be too much. While works make the publishers lose money, the authors tend to reap a great deal of money. In a planned economy, publishers are subject to various constraints, whether they want to do so or not. And to comfort myself with the theory of “abundance and apology”. However, under the impact of the market economy, publishing houses have fallen into serious problems