在WTO框架内的DSU(争端解决规则和程序的谅解)作为世贸组织争端解决机制中最有特色的一部分,为解决成员国之间的纠纷和促进它们的贸易平衡,发挥了重要的作用。我国的民事诉讼法作为解决民事纠纷的程序法,其与DSU有可比之处,本文就二者在总则、相关制度设置方面进行比较以浅析异同。 The DSU (Understanding of Dispute Settlement Rules and Procedures) within the WTO framework, as one of the most distinctive parts of the WTO dispute settlement mechanism, has played an important role in resolving disputes between Member States and in promoting their trade balance. As a procedural law to solve civil disputes, China’s civil procedural law is comparable to DSU. This article compares the two in terms of general rules and relevant system settings to analyze similarities and differences.