论文部分内容阅读
中国学术界对中国古代统治思想的误判已经达到极其严重的程度。这一类误判出自所有的学术流派,影响范围波及所有相关研究领域,被误判的研究对象囊括中国古代所有重大政治理论现象,具有宏观误判与微观误判、整体性误判与局部性误判相互交织的特征,其成因涉及学术判断的事实基础、逻辑基础和哲学基础,属于集体性、全局性、系统性和结构性的误判。以“立君为民”命题及“民贵君轻”命题为典型例证,以六大类直接影响全局性判断的整体性判断为纲目,运用罗列事实的方法,可以证明集体性的重大误判确实存在,相关研究领域有必要进行全局性、系统性、结构性的学术改造。
Chinese academics have misjudged the ancient Chinese ruling thoughts to an extremely serious extent. This type of misjudgment comes from all the academic schools. Its influence spreads to all relevant research fields. The subjects of misjudgment include all major political theory phenomena in ancient China, with macro-misjudgments and micro-misjudgments, overall misjudgments and partialities The causes of misjudgment and intertwining are related to the factual basis, logical basis and philosophical basis of academic judgment, which belong to the collective, global, systematic and structural miscarriage of justice. Taking the proposition of “establishing the people for the people” and the proposition of “the people being the most prudent and the people being light” as the typical examples, the overall judgment of the six categories that directly affect the overall judgment is taken as the keynote. The method of enumerating the facts can prove that the collective Of the major miscarriage of justice does exist, the relevant research areas necessary for a global, systematic, structural academic transformation.