论文部分内容阅读
在苏力先生的“耕牛”案中,“搭伙”关系更可能是一种租赁关系的。司法三段论的小前提(即作为陈述的案件事实)形成的相对独立性,是法官裁判合理性的必要条件。在司法程序中,双方诉讼当事人的参与使得“作为辩论的案件事实”能够从一个无限庞杂的案件客观事实中剥离出来。法官应当穷尽“作为辩论的案件事实”的全部细节来进行法律评判,从而形成作为陈述的案件事实,而非援引法律规范从案件客观事实中将其捡拾。
In Mr. Su Li’s case of “cattle farming,” “partnership” is more likely to be a leasehold. The relative independence formed by the small premise of judicial syllogism (that is, the facts as a stated case) is a necessary condition for the judge’s reasonableness. In the judicial process, the participation of litigants of both parties makes it possible to divest from the objective facts of an infinite number of cases. Judges should exhaust the full details of “the facts of the case as a matter of debate” in their legal judgment, thereby forming the facts of the case as a statement rather than invoking the legal norms to pick them up from the objective facts of the case.