论文部分内容阅读
本文基于大西南(非平原)与华北平原地区农户的调研样本数据,对农户秸秆还田技术采纳情况分别构建二元选择Logit模型,定量分析了其影响因素。结果表明:农户采纳此技术受监管约束与惩罚、补贴、信息诱导三种政策工具及土地机械化操作程度、环境认知等因素的正向影响;受贫富差距因素负向影响。在区分两类地区基础上发现,信息诱导、土地机械化操作程度、环境认知是影响农户秸秆还田技术采纳行为的共同正向影响因素,而监管约束与惩罚措施、补贴刺激、贫富差距在两类地区农户中的影响程度不同。对非平原地区农户而言,家庭贫困因素是制约其采纳行为的关键因素,政府的监管约束与惩罚措施有正向影响,但补贴刺激未起到效果;对平原地区农户而言,其采纳行为受家庭贫困因素影响不明显,政府的补贴起到了较大的促进作用,而监管约束机制下的惩罚措施反而抑制了其采纳行为倾向。
Based on the survey data of farmers in the Southwest (non-plains) and North China Plain, this paper constructs the Logit model of binary selection for the adoption of straw-returning technology and analyzes the influencing factors quantitatively. The results show that farmers adopt three kinds of policy tools including regulatory constraints and penalties, subsidies and information induction, as well as positive effects of mechanization of land mechanization and environmental cognition, and are negatively affected by the gap between rich and poor factors. On the basis of distinguishing two types of areas, it is found that information induction, mechanization of land mechanization and environmental cognition are common positive factors that affect farmers’ adoption of straw-returning technology. Regulatory constraints and punitive measures, subsidy stimulus, The impact of the two types of farmers is different. For non-plain farmers, the family poverty factor is the key factor that restricts their adoption behavior. The government’s regulatory constraints and penalties have a positive effect, but the subsidy stimulation does not have the effect. For the farmers in plain areas, the adoption behavior Impacted by the family poverty factor is not obvious, the government subsidies played a greater role in promoting, but the regulatory measures under the restraint mechanism has inhibited its adoption behavior tendency.