近几年的相关研究中,出现一种观点,认为诗学“活法”说不始于吕本中,最先提出者当是北宋后期西昆体诗人胡宿。本文欲将胡宿提出的“活法”与吕本中的“活法”说进行一个比较,同中见异,更好地了解二人的“活法”在中国古典诗学中的重要作用。本文从二人“活法”说的提出、“活法”被赋予的内涵,以及所针对的弊端三个方面来分析比较。 In the related researches in recent years, there is a view that the poetic theory of “living law” does not begin with Lvbenzhong, but was first proposed by Hu Kun, a poet of Western Kunlun in the late Northern Song Dynasty. This paper intends to compare Hu’s “live law” with “live law” in Lu Benzhong, and see the difference between the two, to better understand the two “living law” in the Chinese classical poetics In the important role. This article analyzes and compares three connotations, the connotation of “living law”, and the disadvantages of the “living law”.