论文部分内容阅读
以南水北调引江原水为研究对象,比较脉冲澄清强化集成工艺与常规工艺处理效果的差异。试验结果表明,引江原水分别采用常规、加预氧化、加助凝工艺处理后,出水水质均能满足《生活饮用水卫生标准》(GB 5749-2006)的要求。由于引江原水水质较好,采用常规处理工艺即可达到较好的处理效果,采用常规+HCA助凝工艺处理时,对引江原水的浊度和CODMn的去除率最高。
Taking the raw water of South-North Water Diversion Project as the research object, the difference of the effect of pulse clarification-enhanced integrated process and conventional process was compared. The test results show that the quality of effluent can meet the requirements of “drinking water health standard” (GB 5749-2006) after the raw water from the Yangtze River is used respectively by conventional, pre-oxidation and coagulation-assisted process. Due to the good quality of the raw water from the Yangtze River, the conventional treatment process can achieve better treatment effect. When the conventional + HCA coagulation treatment process is adopted, the turbidity and CODMn removal rate of the raw water from the Yangtze River reaches the highest.