论文部分内容阅读
《四川文物》1990年第6期发表了周基华同志撰《<关河诸先烈蜀难殉国记》的发现与考述》(下简称《殉国记》)一文。周基华同志在该文中对《殉国记》所述部分史实进行了考证,结论是:“《殉国记》所述史实是完全可靠的,”以为“《殉国记》有纠史之误的重要价值、从它的记述中,可以补正多年来史志诸家对宜宾地区辛亥革命的错误记述。”周文列举了四种“过去记述错误,”并逐一批驳。周要求还历史本来面目的求实精神可嘉可佩。但笔者拜读周先生的大作后,对周先生的纠谬不敢完全苟同。周认为《四川保路运动史》第310页所载:“东路民军不得
“Sichuan cultural relics” in 1990 the sixth issue of Comrade Zhou Jihua wrote “the discovery of the martyrdom of the martyrs and death of the martyrs” discovery and test “(hereinafter referred to as” martyrdom “) article. In the article, Comrade Zhou Jihua conducted a research on part of the historical facts described in the Book of Martownhood, and concluded: ”The historical facts described in the Book of Martyrations are completely reliable. It is believed that the important value of mistaken revision of the Book of Martyrations, From its description, it is possible to correct the erroneous account of Shih-Ch’i-shih’s family of many people over the years in the 1911 Revolution in the Yibin area. “Zhou Wen cites four” mistakes in the past “and criticizes them one by one. Week also requires the history of the true spirit of commendable commendable. However, after I read Mr. Zhou’s masterpiece, I can not completely agree with Mr. Zhou’s fallacy. Weeks think ”Sichuan Paul Road Sports History“ contained in page 310: ”East Road, the military is not allowed