论文部分内容阅读
山东大学法学院陇夫指出,法制是一个民族、一个国家文化创造能力、社会调控能力和国民自信程度的综合反映。即使一个国家引进外来的法制,也不可能是全盘的拿来主义。美国、澳大利业以及加拿大等国的法律对英国法律的继受关系恐怕在整个人类法律发展的历史中也是最全面的和最深刻的,然而,这并不影响这些国家和原先的宗主国之间最终在其国内法律体系上各具特色。所以,它们的法律之间虽然还有诸多牵连,但决不能说是一样。因之在法学上的折射也是如此;尽管
Long Fu, a law school of Shandong University, pointed out that the legal system is a comprehensive reflection of the ability of a nation and a country to create culture, adjust the ability of the society and the confidence of the people. Even if a country introduces an external legal system, it can not be wholly foreign-minded. The law of Britain, the United States, Australia, Canada and other countries may be the most comprehensive and profound in the history of the development of human law. However, this does not affect the relations between these countries and the former sovereign states Eventually have their own characteristics in their legal system. Therefore, although there are still many implications between their laws, they can not be said to be the same. The same is true of refraction in law; though