论文部分内容阅读
界定公共利益,划清公共利益与私人利益的边界,是解决城市更新合法性问题的关键和基础。而目前公共利益的判定存在着无法明晰界定内涵与外延的困境。因此必须打破思维定势,将“什么是公共利益”转化为“由谁来界定公共利益”这样一个问题,以“公众受益性”和“受益人的不特定性和多数性”为标准,遵循法律保留、比例与正当程序原则;由人民代表大会及其常务委员会对“公共利益”的内涵与外延界定,并引入司法机构裁判,以听证、补偿、监督和救济程序为保障。
Defining the public interest and defining the boundary between the public interest and the private interest are the key and foundation for solving the problem of the legitimacy of urban renewal. At present, the judgment of the public interest is not able to clearly define the connotation and extension of the plight. Therefore, we must break the mindset and change the issue of “what is the public interest ” into “who defines the public interest ”, taking the “public benefit” and the “unspecific Majority ”and follow the principle of legal reservation, proportion and due process. The People’s Congress and its Standing Committee define the connotation and extension of “ public interest ”and introduce judicatory referees to hear, compensate and supervise And relief procedures for the protection.