本文从研究目的、研究途径和研究层面的差异对比维特根斯坦的语法思想与普通语法思想;从两者究竟注重相似性还是差异性、普遍性还是任意性、形式还是意义出发,进行深入探讨。作者指出,维特根斯坦的“语言游戏”、“生活形式”等思想有助于“综观”语言,有助于澄清我们对语法和语言的误解,有助于更好理解语法和语言的本性。 This article compares Wittgenstein’s grammatical thinking and ordinary grammar thinking from the research purpose, the research approach and the research level difference, and discusses whether the two should focus on the similarity or the difference, the universality or the arbitrariness, the form or the meaning. The author points out that Wittgenstein’s ideas of “Language Game ”, “Life Form ” contribute to the “overview ” language and help to clarify our misunderstandings of grammar and language and help to better understand Grammar and language nature.