论文部分内容阅读
长篇小说在文学地形图中占据的位置似乎越来越显眼了,有的人士很为鲁迅遗憾:“鲁迅确实一直没有能够写成一部代表作。他缺一部或几部长篇小说。”有的人士干脆以此来否定鲁迅的文学地位:“鲁迅以一堆杂文几个短篇是立不住的,没听说有世界文豪就写这么一点东西。”鲁迅不是神,可以怀疑,也可以否定,不必大惊小怪。但是,如果我们对鲁迅为何没有写出长篇小说以及如何看侍一个作家的文学地位先作一些认真的思考和具体的分析,我相信是不会得出如此武断和轻率的结论的。
The position occupied by novels in literary topographic maps seems to be getting more and more conspicuous. Some people regret Lu Xun: “Lu Xun really has not been able to write a masterpiece.” He lacks one or several novels. “Some people Simply to deny the literary status of Lu Xun: ”Lu Xun to a bunch of essays a few short stories can not stand, did not hear the world writers wrote such a thing." Lu Xun is not God, you can suspect, you can also deny, do not have Fuss However, if we take some serious thought and concrete analysis before why Lu Xun wrote novels and how to read the literary status of a writer, I believe we can not draw such an arbitrary and reckless conclusion.