论文部分内容阅读
1923年长沙《大公报》抨击省宪被停刊,围绕这一事件,当时人们对言论自由的宪法保障进行了全方位的讨论。宪法之所以要对言论自由进行保障,主要是为了保障人们对有关公共事务进行思考和讨论的权利,实现人民当家做主。对这种“公言论”的禁止,除非它的发表会对社会产生“明显而且即刻”的危险,以致事后难以补救,否则要受到宪法的保护。宪法保护批评它自己的言论。
In 1923, “Ta Kung Pao” in Changsha attacked that the provincial constitution was suspended. Around this incident, people conducted a comprehensive discussion on the constitutional guarantee of freedom of speech. The reason why the constitution guarantees freedom of speech is mainly to guarantee people’s right to think and discuss about public affairs so as to realize that people should be the masters of their own affairs. The prohibition on such “public comment” unless it poses a danger of “obvious and immediate” to the community makes it difficult to remedy the situation or be protected by the Constitution. Constitutional protection criticizes its own remarks.