论文部分内容阅读
中共对南昌起义的一系列指导,不仅体现在起义的酝酿、决策阶段,还体现在起义爆发后南征途中。其中包括指示广东、湖南等省发动暴动配合起义以及做好起义失败后的善后工作等。纵观中共对南昌起义的系列指导和举措,可以看出其中贯穿一条鲜明的主线,就是紧紧围绕着“民众武装暴动”这一政策。早在南昌起义发动之前,中共就决定在湘鄂粤赣四省发动农民秋收暴动,所以中共对南昌起义的指导离不开这一既定方针。同时,中共中央关于暴动主要依靠群众,军事力量只是副力的思想严重影响着其对南昌起义的领导和评价,而共产国际的“指导”直接左右中共对南昌起义的决策。
The CPC’s series of instructions on Nanchang’s uprising were not only reflected in the brewing and decision-making stages of the uprising, but also reflected in the southern journey after the outbreak of the intifada. Including instructions Guangdong, Hunan and other provinces riot with the uprising and do a good job after the uprising failure and so on. Looking at the series of instructions and measures the CPC poses about the Nanchang Uprising, we can see that there is a clear thread that runs through a policy of “armed insurrection by the people.” Before the launch of the Nanchang Uprising, the CCP decided to launch a peasant uprising in the four provinces of Hunan, Hubei, Guangdong, Jiangxi and so on. Therefore, the CPC’s guide to the Nanchang Uprising can not be separated from this established principle. At the same time, the CPC Central Committee’s thinking on “rebellion mainly relying on the masses and its military power only on the vice force has a serious impact on its leadership and evaluation of the Nanchang Uprising. The” guidance "of the Comintern directly affects the CPC’s decision-making on the Nanchang Uprising.