论文部分内容阅读
中国的科技界与教育界在共同推动中小学科技教育发展中虽有很好的合作传统,但是这种合作尚未“体制化”。科技团体是科技界的重要力量和参与社会活动的主要代表。本文比较了美国科促会、英国皇家学会、中国科协介入中小学科技教育的不同模式,并分析了造成这些差异的社会原因,提出应构建多元资源体系以支持中国科技教育的发展。
Although there is a good tradition of cooperation between science and technology education circles in China and the education sector in jointly promoting the development of science and technology education in primary and secondary schools, such cooperation has not yet been “institutionalized.” Science and technology groups are the major force in science and technology and their main representatives in participating in social activities. This paper compares the different modes of science and technology education in the primary and secondary schools of the United States Council for Science and Technology, the Royal Society and China Association for science and technology and analyzes the social causes of these differences. It proposes that a multi-dimensional resource system should be constructed to support the development of science and technology education in China.