论文部分内容阅读
为回顾新中国成立60年来裁判文书的演变,本刊按年代随机抽取6份民事裁判文书请最高人民法院研究室主任、中国法学会法律文书学研究会副会长胡云腾作一点评。这几份裁判文书分别是最高人民法院1950年民抗字第13号民事裁定、1961年民上字第1号民事判决书、1976年民二字第1号民事判决书、1983年民提字第1号民事判决书、1995年民终字第5号民事判决书和2008年民二终字第6号民事判决书。虽然这些裁判文书解决的都是寻常的民事争议,并不能完整地反映人民法院裁判文书的发展变化脉络,但从中还是可以看到我国法治和司法工作曲折前进的蹒跚脚印,看到最高人民法院为规范裁判文书长期进行的努力,看到裁判文书独特的史料价值。
In order to review the evolution of the judgment instruments in the 60 years since the founding of People’s Republic of China, this journal publishes 6 civil judgment documents at random according to the age, asking Hu Yunteng, Director of the Supreme People’s Court, and Hu Yunteng, vice president of the Law Society of China Law Society to make a comment. These are the verdicts of the Supreme People’s Court in 1950 civil resistance No. 13 civil ruling, civil first word in 1961 Civil Judgment, the first civil sentence in 1976 No. 1, the word people in 1983 first word Civil Judgment 1995, Minjian Zi No. 5 Civil Judgment and Minzhong Final Word No. 6 Civil Judgment. Although all these verdict documents solve common civil disputes and do not completely reflect the changing context of the judgments in the people’s courts, we can still see the stagnant footsteps of the tortuous progress of the rule of law and judicial work in our country. We can see that the Supreme People’s Court To standardize the long-term efforts of referee instruments and to see the unique historical value of referee instruments.