论文部分内容阅读
目的:对门诊不合理处方干预及改进方式进行了研究。方法:选择了本院2015年9月到2016年6月的98例不合理处方,对其采用了回顾分析的方式。结果:研究中对处方干预及临床科室分布进行了分析,发现不良处方中内科构成比例为34.69%,不良处方的外科构成比例为25.51%,简易门诊的构成比例为11.22%。同时,研究中也对不合理处方进行了对比,对其错误累计进行了分析,研究中发现不规范处方37例,所占比例为37.76%,不适宜处方为31例,所占比例为31.63%,超常规处方为30例,所占比例为30.61%,数据研究分析中无明显差异,结果具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:通过对门诊不合理处方的研究可以发现,处方干预可以有效保证患者的用药安全,并通过研究方式的完善,可以进行事前干预措施的优化,提高处方的质量以及用药水平,充分保证医疗结果的安全性。
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the unreasonable prescription interventions and improvement methods in outpatients. Methods: We selected 98 cases of unreasonable prescriptions in our hospital from September 2015 to June 2016, and adopted a retrospective analysis method. Results: In this study, we analyzed the prescription interventions and the distribution of clinical departments. The results showed that 34.69% of the poor prescriptions, 25.51% of the poor prescriptions, and 11.22% of the simple outpatients. At the same time, the research also compared the unreasonable prescriptions, and analyzed the errors accumulated. In the study, 37 cases were found to have non-standard prescriptions, accounting for 37.76%, 31 cases not suitable for prescriptions, accounting for 31.63% , 30 were unconventional prescriptions, accounting for 30.61%. There was no significant difference in data analysis, the results were statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusion: Through the study of unreasonable prescriptions in outpatients, it can be found that prescription intervention can effectively ensure the safety of patients’ medication. Through the improvement of research methods, the pre-intervention interventions can be optimized, the quality of prescription and medication level can be improved, and the medical outcomes can be fully guaranteed Security.