论文部分内容阅读
目的比较分析国际采矿与金属委员会风险评估方法(ICMM)、罗马尼亚职业事故和职业病风险评估方法(MLSP)在陶瓷生产企业尘肺风险评估中的适用性,探索适合陶瓷生产企业尘肺风险评估的模型。方法随机选取27家陶瓷生产企业为研究对象,调查制粉、压机、吹尘、喷釉和打磨5个重点岗位,采集粉尘浓度数据并进行两种风险评估。结果这5个岗位总尘(呼尘)超标率分别为100(100)%、100(55.6)%、95.2(85.7)%、80(60)%、100(100)%。这些岗位的矽肺壹期风险用ICMM定量法判定为不可容忍,ICMM矩阵法判定为高风险,MLSP判定为中等风险。尘肺风险评估结果得到了现场检测结果、粉尘作业分级结果以及相关文献报道的验证。结论 ICMM风险评估方法在陶瓷生产企业尘肺风险评估上有一定的优势。
Objective To compare and analyze the applicability of the International Council on Mining and Metals (ICMM), the Romanian Occupational Accident and Occupational Disease Risk Assessment (MLSP) method for risk assessment of pneumoconiosis in ceramics manufacturing enterprises and to explore a model suitable for risk assessment of pneumoconiosis in ceramics manufacturing enterprises. Methods A total of 27 ceramic enterprises were chosen as the research objects. Five key positions of milling, pressing, blowing, enamelling and grinding were investigated. The dust concentration data were collected and two risk assessments were conducted. Results The over-standard rates of total dust (dust) in these five posts were 100 (100)%, 100 (55.6)%, 95.2 (85.7)%, 80 (60)% and 100 (100)% respectively. The risk of Silicosis Phase I in these posts was judged to be intolerable by the ICMM quantitative method, the ICMM matrix method was judged as high risk, and the MLSP was judged as medium risk. Pneumoconiosis risk assessment results have been field test results, dust grading results and related literature verification. Conclusion The ICMM risk assessment method has certain advantages in the risk assessment of pneumoconiosis in ceramic manufacturing enterprises.