论文部分内容阅读
法院主管直接体现了审判权的空间范围,由于在民事诉讼中,审判权与诉权总是并行不悖、相互作用,因而审判空间范围也就是当事人诉权的空间范围。完善法院主管制度,明确法院主管范围,对于保证法院正确、及时行使审判权,解决纠纷,当事人依法、及时行使诉权以寻求法律保护,均具有重要意义。 我国当前法院民事主管制度存在的问题 我国法院民事主管制度存在的首要问题是立法过于原则、抽象,缺乏科学、合理、系统的规定。《民事诉讼法》对法院主管制度规定得相当原则,从第3条的规定来看,公民之间、法人之间,其他组织之间以及他们相互之间只要是因财产关系和人身关系而产生的纠纷,均属民事诉讼范围。但是,由于我国以前实行计划经济体了制,民事主体之间的财产关系和人身关系受到政府政策的强烈影响,许多财产关系的产生和变更,均直接由政府政策、命令所引起,法院实际上很难处理。因《民事诉讼法》规定过于笼统,只能由最高法院运用大量的司法解释和个案批复对法院主管问题作出规定,这种法院主管范围由法院自己说了算的做法首先在法理上难于找
Court chief directly reflects the scope of the jurisdiction of the scope of jurisdiction, as in civil proceedings, the right of action and the right to appeal always go hand in hand, interact, so the scope of trial space is the scope of the parties litigation space. Perfecting the system of court supervisors and clarifying the scope of the courts are of great significance for ensuring the courts correctly and timely exercising the right of trial, settling disputes and litigating their rights in a timely manner in accordance with the law. China’s current court civil supervisor system problems China’s court civil supervisor system, the most important issue is the legislation is too principled, abstract, the lack of scientific, reasonable and systematic rules. The Code of Civil Procedure provides for the principle of the system of competent courts. From the point of the provisions of Article 3, citizens, legal persons and other organizations, as well as their mutual relations, are only affected by property relations and personal relationships Of the disputes, are the scope of civil proceedings. However, due to the previous implementation of the system of planned economy in our country, the property relations and personal relations between the civil subjects are strongly influenced by the government policies. Many property relations are arising and changed directly by government policies and orders. The courts actually Hard to deal with. Because the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure are too general, the Supreme Court can only provide a large number of judicial interpretations and case approval on the issue of the competent court, which is difficult to find by law