论文部分内容阅读
目的对400例行计划生育手术服务对象的心理健康及生活质量进行分析。方法采取自愿原则在本院2014年6月—2016年6月所接收的行计划生育手术服务对象中选取400例,并依据手术方式将所有服务对象分为2组:宫内节育器组(200例)与人工流产手术组(200例)。对2组服务对象进行心理健康、生活质量对比分析。结果宫内节育器组心理健康、生活质量优于人工流产手术组,差异有统计学意义(P值均<0.05)。结论应该将置(取)宫内节育器手术作为有效避孕措施,将人工流产手术作为避孕失败的补救措施,在临床上推广。
Objective To analyze the mental health and quality of life of 400 family planning service clients. Methods According to the principle of voluntariness, 400 cases of family planning operation received from June 2014 to June 2016 in our hospital were selected and divided into two groups according to the operation method: IUD group (200 Cases) and abortion group (200 cases). On the two groups of service subjects mental health, quality of life comparative analysis. Results The IUD group had better mental health and quality of life than the induced abortion group (P <0.05). Conclusion IUD (intrauterine device) should be taken as an effective contraceptive method and artificial abortion should be taken as a remedy for contraceptive failure, so it should be clinically promoted.