论文部分内容阅读
目的观察中西医结合治疗小儿上呼吸道感染的疗效,探讨其在小儿上呼吸道感染治疗中的临床应用价值。方法对80例上呼吸道感染患儿进行治疗方法和治疗效果的研究,随机分为观察组和对照组。对照组采用利巴韦林进行抗病毒治疗,合并感染的患儿应用抗生素,观察组在接受与对照组完全相同的西药治疗的基础上,服用中成药双黄连颗粒。对比两组患儿治疗效果的差异。结果经过治疗,观察组患儿治疗效果为痊愈和好转的人数明显多于对照组,经χ2检验,治疗有效率的组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);治疗过程中,观察组患儿见效更快,发热、咽痛、咽部充血、鼻塞、流涕等症状、体征消失所需时间均短于对照组,经t检验,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);治疗过程中,两组患儿均未观察到与药物治疗有明显关联的不良反应,两种治疗方案均安全。结论中西医结合治疗小儿上呼吸道感染总体疗效较好,症状、体征改善快,且安全可靠。
Objective To observe the efficacy of integrated traditional Chinese and western medicine in the treatment of pediatric upper respiratory tract infection and to explore its clinical value in the treatment of pediatric upper respiratory tract infection. Methods 80 cases of upper respiratory tract infection in children with treatment methods and treatment of research, were randomly divided into observation group and control group. The control group was treated with ribavirin for antiviral therapy. The infected children were treated with antibiotics. The observation group received the Chinese medicine Shuanghuanglian granules on the basis of exactly the same western medicine treatment as the control group. The difference between the two groups of children was compared. Results After treatment, the therapeutic effect in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group. There was significant difference between the two groups (P <0.05) by χ2 test. In the treatment group, Children with faster, fever, sore throat, pharyngeal hyperemia, nasal congestion, runny nose and other symptoms, signs of disappearance of the time required were shorter than the control group, by t test, the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05); treatment In the two groups of children were not observed with the drug treatment were significantly associated with adverse reactions, both treatment options are safe. Conclusion Chinese and Western medicine treatment of children with upper respiratory tract infection overall effect is good, symptoms, signs improved quickly, and safe and reliable.