论文部分内容阅读
介绍和研究了新加坡上诉庭作出的两个重要扣船判例(即The“Vasiliy Golovnin”案和The“Bunge Melati 5”案)的相关内容,并对新加坡《高等法庭(海事管辖权)法》有关条款进行了简要分析。在此基础上,对新加坡上诉庭法官在最新的The“Bunge Melati 5”案判决中阐述的索赔人在新加坡申请扣船的举证责任及其证明标准进行了简要评述,得出新加坡上诉庭在上述两个案件中试图对扣船相关当事人的权利义务建立一定的平衡的结论。
Introduced and studied two important cases of arrest in Singapore Court of Appeals (The “Vasiliy Golovnin ” case and The “Bunge Melati 5 ”) and introduced the “High Court of Singapore (Maritime jurisdiction ) Act ”a brief analysis of the relevant provisions. On this basis, a brief commentary was made on the burden of proof and the standard of proof for claimants in Singapore applying for arrest by the Singapore Court of Appeal judge in the latest Judgment of The “Bunge Melati 5 ”. It concludes that the Court of Appeal of Singapore Trying to establish a certain balance between the rights and obligations of the parties involved in the arrest of the vessel in the above two cases.