对搜查、扣押、冻结等强制性侦查措施检察监督有关问题研究

来源 :法学杂志 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:qqqq406340142
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
我国《刑事诉讼法》及有关司法解释对强制性侦查措施的立法规定存在严重不足,缺乏完备的监督制约机制,容易导致权力滥用。在我国现有刑事法律框架内,依据刑事司法权力配置原则,应当建立以检察机关为主导的强制性侦查措施司法审查制度、非法证据排除规则和对违法强制性侦查措施行为的惩罚规定,完善刑事相对人的救济途径,以确保强制性侦查措施的规范、公正、高效使用。 China’s “Criminal Procedure Law” and the judicial interpretation of the compulsory measures for investigation of the existence of a serious lack of legislation, the lack of a comprehensive monitoring and control mechanism, easily lead to abuse of power. Within the existing framework of criminal law in our country, in accordance with the principle of the allocation of criminal justice power, a system of judicial review of mandatory investigation measures led by procuratorial organs, rules for the exclusion of unlawful evidence and penalties for violations of compulsory criminal investigation measures should be established, Relative to the way of relief to ensure the compulsory detection measures of the norms, fair and efficient use.
其他文献
北京联合出版公司2016年7月自文明发轫以来,全世界人类都通过符号、雕刻、建筑或神圣物品,表达重要的人生经验,同时也表达着人们对宇宙万物的理解与想象,符号于是也成了人类