论文部分内容阅读
通过对由北京市第一中级人民法院撤销的由国家知识产权局专利复审委员会做出的无效宣告请求审查决定的一件案件的案情进行分析比较,试图探析北京市第一中级人民法院与国家知识产权局专利复审委员会针对同一项实用新型专利,根据相同的证据为什么会产生完全不同的认定结果的原因,并通过对该案件的案情进行分析,希望能够帮助当事人了解法院的审判过程,特别是给当事人应当如何正确使用已有的证据为自己答辩提供一些帮助。
By analyzing and comparing the merits of a case decided by the Patent Reexamination Board of State Intellectual Property Office, which was revoked by the First Intermediate People’s Court of Beijing and tried to probe into the case of Beijing No.1 Intermediate People’s Court and State Knowledge The Patent Reexamination Board of SIPO for the same utility model patents, based on the same evidence of why there is a completely different causes of the findings, and by analyzing the case of the case, hoping to help the parties understand the court trial process, especially to The parties should properly use the available evidence to provide some help for their defense.