Based on remote sensing data, field investigation and trench measurement along the piedmont fault (Wujumengkou Dongfengcun) of Mt. Serteng, the vertical displacement rate has been found to be 0 88～1 83mm/a since the late period of late Pleistocene and 0 89mm/a since the middle period of Holocene. Using the progressive constraining method,five paleoearthquake events have been distinguished from two large trenches since Holocene. They occurred 9000±1300a B.P., 6500±500a B.P., 5770a B.P., 4200±300a B.P. and 3250±250a B.P., respectively. From the late period of late Pleistocene to the beginning of Holocene, some paleoearthquake events may have been missed due to a variety of reasons. All of the paleoearthquake events displayed clustering characteristics to a certain extent. The first cluster was occurred around 8900a B.P., the second cluster occurred between 5700～6500a B.P. and the last cluster was occurred in 3250～4200 a B.P. The interval between the first cluster and the second cluster was about 2400a while that between the second cluster and the third cluster was only 1570a. No earthquake events have cut the ground surface along this active fault segment since 3250a B.P. The lapse time is more than the recurrence interval between two paleoearthquake clusters. Therefore, there is a potential risk for a recurring earthquake along this active fault segment. Based on remote sensing data, field investigation and trench measurement along the piedmont fault (Wujumengkou Dongfengcun) of Mt. Serteng, the vertical displacement rate has been found to be 0 88 ~ 1 83mm / a since the late period of late Pleistocene and 0 89mm / a since the middle period of Holocene. Using the progressive constraining method, five paleoearthquake events have been distinguished from two large trenches since Holocene. They have 9000 ± 1300a BP, 6500 ± 500a BP, 5770a BP, 4200 ± 300a BP and 3250 ± 250a BP, respectively. From the late period of late Pleistocene to the beginning of Holocene, some paleoearthquake events may have been missed due to a variety of reasons. All of the paleoearthquake events displayed clustering characteristics to a certain extent. The first cluster was around 8900a BP, the second cluster occurred between 5700 ~ 6500a BP and the last cluster was occurred in 3250 ~ 4200 a BP The interval between the first cluster a nd the second cluster was about 2400a while that between the second cluster and the third cluster was only 1570a. No earthquake events have cut the ground surface along this active fault segment since 3250a BP The lapse time is more than the recurrence interval between two paleoearthquake clusters Therefore, there is a potential risk for a recurring earthquake along this active fault segment.