论文部分内容阅读
目的 考察不同疗程直流电治疗创伤性面神经损伤的效果。方法 40只家兔随机分为常规治疗组(Rt组 )、电刺激一疗程组 (Es1组 )、电刺激二疗程组 (Es2组 )、电刺激三疗程组 (Es3组 ) ,分别给予不同疗程电刺激治疗 ,进行组织学观察、神经电图 (ENoG)测定、计量病理学研究。结果 ①电刺激各组对神经恢复均有促进作用 ,电刺激二疗程、三疗程作用效果明显优于电刺激一疗程。②对于中度神经损伤 ,电刺激作用时间与神经恢复并不呈线性关系。电刺激三疗程与二疗程治疗效果相近。结论 对于神经中度损伤 ,电刺激二疗程为适宜治疗周期
Objective To investigate the effect of different duration of DC treatment on traumatic facial nerve injury. Methods Forty rabbits were randomly divided into routine treatment group (Rt group), electrical stimulation group (Es1 group), electrical stimulation group (Es2 group), and electrical stimulation group (Es3 group) Electrical Stimulation, Histological Observation, Electroencephalography (ENoG), Metrological Pathology. Results (1) Each group of electrical stimulation had the promotion effect on nerve recovery. The electrical stimulation two courses, the effect of three courses was better than that of electrical stimulation one course. ② For moderate nerve injury, the time of electrical stimulation is not linear with nerve recovery. Three courses of electrical stimulation and two courses of treatment effect is similar. Conclusion For moderate nerve damage, two cycles of electrical stimulation are the appropriate treatment cycle