论文部分内容阅读
目的观察传统手术与微创手术治疗小儿疝气的疗效。方法选取收治的小儿疝气患者64例,随机分为对照组和观察组,每组32例。对照组采用传统手术进行治疗,观察组采用微创手术进行治疗。观察比较2组临床效果及不良反应发生情况。结果观察组手术时间(12.11±1.72)min,术中出血量(1.64±0.12)ml,住院时间(1.5±0.5)d,自主活动时间(11.63±1.64)h,与对照组比较差异显著(P<0.05);观察组不良反应发生率为9.38%,低于对照组的31.25%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论微创手术治疗小儿疝气临床效果优于传统手术,且不良反应发生率较低,表明微创手术治疗小儿疝气有较大的临床应用价值。
Objective To observe the curative effect of traditional surgery and minimally invasive surgery on pediatric hernia. Methods Sixty-four children with hernia admitted to our hospital were randomly divided into control group and observation group with 32 cases in each group. The control group was treated by traditional surgery, while the observation group was treated by minimally invasive surgery. The clinical effects and the incidence of adverse reactions in the two groups were observed and compared. Results The operation time (12.11 ± 1.72) min, intraoperative blood loss (1.64 ± 0.12) ml, hospitalization time (1.5 ± 0.5) d and voluntary activity time (11.63 ± 1.64) h were significantly different between the observation group and the control group <0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions in the observation group was 9.38%, which was lower than that in the control group (31.25%), the difference was statistically significant (P <0.01). Conclusion Minimally invasive surgery is superior to traditional surgery in children with hernia and the incidence of adverse reactions is low, which shows that minimally invasive surgery in children with hernia has great clinical value.