论文部分内容阅读
目的比较腹腔镜辅助与直接开腹治疗结肠癌的临床效果。方法选择80例结肠癌患者,随机分为观察组和对照组,观察组用腹腔镜辅助结肠癌根治术,对照组用开腹手术,比较两组术中、术后情况。结果两组手术出血量、术后排气时间、下床活动时间、住院天数和术后并发症上的差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05),两组手术时间和住院费用差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论腹腔镜辅助治疗结肠癌有微创、并发症少、术后恢复快的优点,值得在临床推广应用。
Objective To compare the clinical effects of laparoscopic assisted and direct laparotomy for colon cancer. Methods Eighty patients with colon cancer were selected and randomly divided into observation group and control group. The observation group was assisted by laparoscopy for colon cancer and the control group by laparotomy. The intraoperative and postoperative conditions were compared between the two groups. Results There was significant difference between the two groups in the amount of bleeding after operation, the time of extubation, the time of going to bed, the days of hospitalization and postoperative complications (P <0.05). There was no significant difference in the operation time and hospitalization cost between the two groups Significance (P> 0.05). Conclusions Laparoscopic adjuvant treatment of colon cancer with minimally invasive, less complications, rapid recovery after surgery, it is worth in the clinical application.