论文部分内容阅读
外观设计与立体商标的构成上二者均含有形状和图案等诸多重合要素。因此,当一项对于产品外观造型所做出的富有美感的设计具有足以区别产品来源的特性时,他便可以受到商标法的保护,而立体商标如果在起到表明商品或服务来源的同时也成为一项具有美感的新设计时,毫无疑问也可以受到专利法的保护。所以这两种权利在所保护客体上存在一定程度的重合与交叉。那么实践中外观设计专利与立体商标交叉范围到底有多大?这种权利交叉会不会导致两者在保护的过程中产生冲突?对于申请人来说,其在选择保护模式时应该如何做出最优选择?本文试图通过分析外观设计与立体商标交叉保护的范围和保护方式,对两种保护模式的优劣势给出对比分析。
Designs and three-dimensional trademark of the composition of both contain shapes and patterns and many other coincidence elements. As a result, an aesthetically pleasing design for the appearance of a product can be protected by the Trade Marks Act when it has characteristics sufficient to distinguish the source of the product, and if the three-dimensional mark serves as a source of goods or services When it comes to becoming a new aesthetic design, there is no doubt that it can also be protected by the patent law. Therefore, there is a certain degree of coincidence and intersection of these two kinds of rights on the protected object. So in practice the design patent and the three-dimensional trademark cross scope in the end how much? Cross this right will not lead to the conflict between the two in the protection process? For the applicant, the choice of protection mode should be how to make the most This paper attempts to analyze the advantages and disadvantages of the two protection modes by analyzing the scope and protection methods of cross protection between design and three-dimensional trademarks.