八十年代有句很流行的话:“亏了我一个,幸福十亿人”.这句话出自特定的战争场景,体现了广大官兵为祖国、人民甘于流汗、流血甚至牺牲生命的无私奉献精神,也包含了官兵对十一届三中全会以来改革开放取得巨大成就的喜悦之情.我们宣扬它,是因为它表现了人民子弟兵的精神风貌,体现了人民军队的宗旨.如果说,这次讲“吃亏”,还起到了积极作用的话,那么,在九十年代的今天,一些报纸、刊物上又常常有这样一句话,“当兵亏三年,不当兵亏一辈子”,它又表达了什么呢?有人解释说,“当兵可能少挣三年的钱,吃点亏,但军营锻炼却机会难得”,并以此“奉劝战友一句话:当兵要安心,一辈子不吃亏!”乍一看,这话和所作的解释,道理很实在,也很入时.但是当宣传媒介和思想工作以此教育、鼓动战士时,我们是否该想想它的思维的出发点、价值标准以及由此可能引起的负效果? In the 1980s, there was a very popular saying: “I lost one, one billion happy.” The remark came from a specific war scene, reflecting the dedication and dedication of the broad masses of officers and men who sweat, bleed and even sacrifice their lives for the motherland and people. , But also the delight of officers and soldiers in making great achievements in reform and opening up since the Third Plenary Session of the 11th Central Committee, which we publicize because it shows the mental outlook of the people’s army and reflects the purpose of the People’s Army. If this time In the 1990s, some newspapers and periodicals often made the remark that “when a soldier loses three years and an unlisted soldier dies for a lifetime,” it also expressed an affirmative remark. What is it? Someone explained that “soldiers may earn less for three years and eat less, but military camps have a rare chance to exercise” and “advise comrades in arms that peace of mind should be maintained and no loss in a lifetime!” At first glance, these words and their explanations are both truthful and timely, but when the media and ideological work educate and foster warriors, should we think about the starting point, the standard of value and hence May cause Negative effect?