论文部分内容阅读
转型期的中国司法改革与政治改革之间呈现的是互为依存的关系,但司法改革的路径则应是去政治化。从现在中国的实际来看,解决公众意见与职业主义司法之间的隔阂其路径就是新程序主义,即通过商谈程序架构起公众与司法之间意见交流的通道。法官的裁量、当事人的自主交涉、法官与当事人之间的沟通以及法官与公众意见的交互在审判过程中形成了主观与主观相交错、相碰撞的局面。虽然,这里很容易呈现创造性混沌。
The transitional judicial reform and political reform in China present an interdependent relationship, but the path of judicial reform should be politicized. From the current reality in China, the path to resolving the gap between public opinion and professionalism is to use neo-proceduralism to structure the channel of exchange of opinions between the public and the judiciary through the negotiation process. Judge discretion, the parties’ voluntary negotiation, the communication between the judge and the client and the interaction between the judge and the public opinion form a situation where the subjective and the subjective intersect and collide during the trial. Although, here is easy to show creative chaos.