论文部分内容阅读
【裁判要旨】最高人民法院、最高人民检察院《关于办理受贿刑事案件适用法律若干问题的意见》第9条第1款规定,国家工作人员收受请托人财物后及时退还或者上交的,不是受贿。对于是否属于及时退还或者上交,应综合考虑主客观情况加以认定。如果超过合理期限,退还或上交行为在客观上足以反映出该国家工作人员主观上具有受贿的故意,就不能认定为及时退还或上交,从而不能适用上述条款,应当依法认定该国家工作人员构成受贿罪。
Article 4 Paragraph 1 of Article 9 of the Opinion of the Supreme People’s Court and the Supreme People’s Procuratorate on “Opinions on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Law in Criminal Cases of Bribery” stipulates that national staff members who refuse to pay trusteeship or timely return their property shall not be bribed. Whether it belongs to the timely return or turn in should be considered considering the subjective and objective conditions. If more than a reasonable period of time, the return or submission is objectively enough to reflect the subjective national staff have the intention of taking bribes, you can not be considered as a timely return or turn over, so that the above provisions can not be applied, should be legally recognized as national staff Constitute a bribery.