论文部分内容阅读
在法学研究范式,特别是在法律史学研究范式中,国民性批判据有一席之地。然而,国民性批判由于逻辑上的脆弱性,以及缺乏方法论上的合理性而无法满足法律史学研究的需要。制度习性方法则兼顾法律主体的主观性和规则的客观性,从逻辑学、博弈论、系统论等视角,将研究对象放置在可考的历史环境中,考察规则自身的惰性或自稳性,以及规则嬗变的条件,从而,对法律制度的演化、法律史的发展有较客观的认识。
In the jurisprudence research paradigm, especially in the research paradigm of legal historiography, criticism of national character has its place. However, due to its logical fragility and lack of methodological rationality, the criticism of national character can not meet the needs of legal historiography. The institutional approach takes into account the subjectivity of the subject and the objectivity of the rules. From the perspectives of logic, game theory and system theory, the study object is placed in a testable historical environment to examine the inertia or self- As well as the conditions for the evolution of the rules. Therefore, there is an objective understanding of the evolution of the legal system and the development of legal history.