当中国宪法学好不容易经过了解说性宪法的时代,逐步摆脱政治现实的纠缠,开启其作为科学的宪法学之路时,却又与政治宪法学不期而遇了。此种情势隐约地折射出我国宪法理论界所存在着的“意识形态的迷茫”状况。在这种背景下,张翔教授所倡导的“宪法释义学”的立场便自然构成了中国宪法学“理论博物馆”中的堂皇正论,具有了无可替代的理论和实践 When China’s constitutional law is not easy to pass the era of understanding of the constitution, gradually get rid of the entanglement of political reality, open its science as a science of the road, but also with the political constitution by accident. This kind of situation eloquently reflects the “ideological confusion” that exists in the constitutional theory community in our country. Against this background, Professor Zhang Xiang’s “constitutional interpretation of learning,” the position will naturally constitute the Chinese Constitutional Law “Theoretical Museum ” in the magnanimous orthodoxy, with an irreplaceable theory and practice