类似的话我们一个时期以来听得已经够多,以至于已经听不出其中有什么大的毛病了。那就是在谈到已有的文学史时认为,文学史的写作大体可以分成学术型和教材型的两种,之所以造成上千种平庸的文学史的存在,就是因为教材型文学史写作的泛滥成灾。这是不公平的说法,也不符合学理。 In a similar vein, we have heard so much enough in a period of time that we have not heard of any serious problems. That is to say, when talking about the existing literary history, we think that the writing of literary history can be roughly divided into two types: academic type and teaching type. The reason why thousands of mediocre literary history exist is because of the writing of teaching material type literary history Flooding. This is not fair, nor does it conform to theory.