论文部分内容阅读
本文探讨了对于无解除权人的合同解除行为,而相对人并未在约定或法定期间内向人民法院起诉的情况是否适用合同法司法解释(二)第24条的规定。笔者对合同解除相对方提出异议的方式进行了探讨,建议合同相对方在接到解除合同通知后以书面回函、继续履行合同等方式表示异议时,应认定其与向法院起诉具有同等效力,以提高市场交易的效率,平衡合同双方的利益。
This article explores the application of the provisions of Article 24 of the Interpretation of Judicial Interpretation of Contract Law (Contract Law) to those cases in which the relatives have not lodged a suit in the people’s court without agreement on the termination of contract. The author discusses the ways in which the parties to the contract cancel their objections, and suggests that the opposite party in the contract, after receiving the notification of the termination of the contract, express the objection by writing a reply letter, continuing to perform the contract or the like, To improve the efficiency of market transactions, balance the interests of both parties to the contract.